Vol. 2026 No. 5 (2026)
Articles

On the de-historicizing tendency in the teaching of modern and contemporary Chinese literature courses

Oliver Brown
Association for Scottish Literary Studies (ASLS), c/o Department of Scottish Literature, University of Glasgow,7 University Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8QH, Scotland, United Kingdom
Emily Evans
Association for Scottish Literary Studies (ASLS), c/o Department of Scottish Literature, University of Glasgow,7 University Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8QH, Scotland, United Kingdom

Published 24-09-2026

Keywords

  • Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature Teaching,
  • De-historicization,
  • Great Literary History Perspective

Abstract

Recently, a de-historicizing tendency has emerged in the teaching of Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature courses, manifesting primarily as text-centrism, de-intellectualization, and a drift toward consumerism. This trend is largely driven by the pervasive influence of the "pure literature" concept, the pedagogical shift toward cultivating applied competencies, constraints imposed by insufficient instructional hours, and the failure to clearly differentiate teaching objectives between secondary and tertiary education. Consequently, it is imperative to maintain a vigilant and reflective stance toward this issue. The pedagogy of Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature should restore literary works to their proper historical contexts by establishing a comprehensive "Great Literary History" perspective. This entails expanding the corpus of literary historical materials, returning to the authentic historical scenes of literary production, and rectifying the current bifurcated approach that severs knowledge from capability. Instead, an integrated model of instruction—both inside and outside the classroom—should be advanced, one that synthesizes textual aesthetic appreciation with rigorous literary-historical scrutiny. Throughout the teaching process, whether in the aesthetic selection and recovery of authors and texts or in the judgment and interpretation of their value and significance, a consciousness of literary history must remain thoroughly embedded.

References

  1. Chen, X. (2009). The Main Trends of Contemporary Chinese Literature. Peking University Press. (p. 156)
  2. Gao, Y. (2006). Literary history without writers: A review of three recent textbooks of "Contemporary Chinese Literary History." Contemporary Writers Review, (5), 15.
  3. Wang, B. (2009). Reflection and reconstruction of the history of modern Chinese literature: Discipline or meaning? Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), (6), 56.
  4. Li, Y. (2015). Opening new horizons in the study of Chinese "Revolutionary Literature": Constructing a macro-literary historical perspective. Exploration and Free Views, (2), 69.
  5. Kuang, X. (2013). Shifts in the Perspective of Literary History. Peking University Press. (p. 301)
  6. Xie, Z. (2013). The "Poetic and the True" in Literary History: Collected Essays on the Collation of Modern Chinese Literature. Peking University Press. (p. 450)
  7. Dong, N. (2003). On the infinity of literary history. Literary Heritage, (6).
  8. Chen, Y. (2009). Second Collection of Essays from Jianming Hall: Preface to Chen Yuan’s "A Catalogue of the Remaining Dunhuang Manuscripts after the Pilfering". SDX Joint Publishing Company. (p. 266)
  9. Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2014). An inseparable historical bond: An interview with Professor Wu Xiuming. New Literary Criticism, (1), 48.
  10. Chen, G. (2013). How Does Literature Become Knowledge? SDX Joint Publishing Company.
  11. Zhu, Z. (1993). The Complete Works of Zhu Yiqing (Vol. 8). Jiangsu Education Publishing House. (p. 206)
  12. Zhu, Z. (1992). The Complete Works of Zhu Yiqing (Vol. 7). Jiangsu Education Publishing House. (p. 191)