Vol. 2026 No. 2 (2026)
Articles

Group therapy for adolescent gaming disorder: intervention efficacy

PDF
  • Anthony Miller,
  • Diane Adams
Anthony Miller
University of Pennsylvania,3451 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
Diane Adams
NPD Group,900 West Shore Road, Port Washington, NY 11050, USA

Published 17-03-2026

Keywords

  • internet addiction,
  • internet gaming disorder,
  • adolescents,
  • intervention,
  • group psychotherapy

Copyright (c) 2026 The Young Thinker's Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
A. Miller and D. Adams, “Group therapy for adolescent gaming disorder: intervention efficacy”, The Young Thinker's Rev., vol. 2026, no. 2, pp. 8–11, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.62852/ytr/2026/245.

Abstract

This study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of group psychotherapy for adolescent internet gaming disorder (IGD). Forty adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria for IGD were randomly allocated to an intervention cohort (n=20) or a control cohort (n=20). Both cohorts received sertraline pharmacotherapy over a 4-month period; concomitantly, the intervention cohort underwent 4 months of structured group psychological intervention comprising seventeen 60-minute weekly sessions. Assessments—including weekly internet usage reports, Internet Addiction Test (IAT), and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)—were conducted at baseline, intervention termination, and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed significant between-group effects, within-subject temporal effects, and group-by-time interactions for IAT scores, SAS scores, and weekly online duration (all p<0.05). Group psychotherapy demonstrated efficacy in reducing internet usage and ameliorating anxiety symptomatology among adolescents with IGD, with sustained benefits supporting long-term rehabilitation and relapse prophylaxis following pharmacological treatment.

PDF

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) [M]. American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.
  2. Nakayama H, Mihara S, Higuchi S. Treatment and risk factors of Internet use disorders [J]. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2016. doi:10.1111/pcn.
  3. King DL, Delfabbro PH. Internet gaming disorder treatment: a review of definitions of diagnosis and treatment outcome [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2014, 70(10): 942-955.
  4. Lei Li. The empirical basis for intervention in adolescent "Internet addiction" [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, (6): 791-797.
  5. Gao Wenbin, Chen Zhiyan. Research on the psychopathological mechanisms and comprehensive psychological intervention of Internet addiction [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2006, (4): 596-603.
  6. Wang Boqun. A review of psychological mechanisms and intervention studies on adolescent Internet addiction [D]. Jilin University, 2008.
  7. Liu Yinghai, Dan Yujin. Research on the attribution and intervention of adolescent Internet addiction from the perspective of exercise psychology [J]. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 2009, 44(7): 44-48.
  8. Chen Qiuming, Wu Yeguang. Psychotherapy for childhood Internet addiction disorder [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation, 2004, 8(18): 3473-3485.
  9. Young KS. Treatment outcomes using CBT-IA with Internet-addicted patients [J]. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2013, 2(4): 209-215.
  10. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder [J]. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1996, 1(3): 237-244.
  11. Sakuma H, Mihara S, Nakayama H, et al. Treatment with the self-discovery camp (S Di C) improves Internet gaming disorder [J]. Addictive Behaviors, 2017, 64: 357-362.
  12. Ma Na, Zhang Wei, Yu Chengfu, et al. Perceived school climate and Internet gaming disorder in junior high school students: a moderated mediation model [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2017, 25(1): 65-69, 74.